<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: PHP: Easy and secure password hashing class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/php-easy-and-secure-password-hashing-class.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/php-easy-and-secure-password-hashing-class.html</link>
	<description>Ich bin nicht verrückt, nur technisch begabt ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:04:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Von: Julius</title>
		<link>http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/php-easy-and-secure-password-hashing-class.html/comment-page-1#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/?p=526#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>@misterjack
I would not use that hashing class, because its code does not apply the common PHP standards.
Also it is very common code that might have holes that could be misused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@misterjack<br />
I would not use that hashing class, because its code does not apply the common PHP standards.<br />
Also it is very common code that might have holes that could be misused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: misterjack</title>
		<link>http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/php-easy-and-secure-password-hashing-class.html/comment-page-1#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>misterjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 09:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/?p=526#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>there is only one true password-hashing-class: http://www.openwall.com/phpass/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is only one true password-hashing-class: <a href="http://www.openwall.com/phpass/" rel="nofollow">http://www.openwall.com/phpass/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Julius</title>
		<link>http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/php-easy-and-secure-password-hashing-class.html/comment-page-1#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/?p=526#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Hi martin,
reversing is &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; possible with a hash.
A hash can be compared with a fingerprint of something. If something has the same fingerprint, it has to be the same thing.
What you are asking for is a encryption. By using a key you can encrypt and decrypt the data.
Use hashes for storing passwords. Use encryption for storing sensitive things like credit card numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi martin,<br />
reversing is <strong>not</strong> possible with a hash.<br />
A hash can be compared with a fingerprint of something. If something has the same fingerprint, it has to be the same thing.<br />
What you are asking for is a encryption. By using a key you can encrypt and decrypt the data.<br />
Use hashes for storing passwords. Use encryption for storing sensitive things like credit card numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: martin</title>
		<link>http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/php-easy-and-secure-password-hashing-class.html/comment-page-1#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 23:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/?p=526#comment-673</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m testing your class and it works fine but, what about reversing hash data into a human readable word again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm testing your class and it works fine but, what about reversing hash data into a human readable word again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Julius</title>
		<link>http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/php-easy-and-secure-password-hashing-class.html/comment-page-1#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Julius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/?p=526#comment-563</guid>
		<description>This is basically true. But this information aims mostly for normal hashing routines. The class is intended to produce a hash that is not usual. There are many rumours about hashing out there but not everyone is true. If you want to use sha1() instead of md5(), it is easily exchangeable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is basically true. But this information aims mostly for normal hashing routines. The class is intended to produce a hash that is not usual. There are many rumours about hashing out there but not everyone is true. If you want to use sha1() instead of md5(), it is easily exchangeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Jani Hartikainen</title>
		<link>http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/php-easy-and-secure-password-hashing-class.html/comment-page-1#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jani Hartikainen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliusbeckmann.de/blog/?p=526#comment-562</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read in a few places that md5 is not really a good choice nowadays. sha1 is much better, and at least I&#039;ve started using it instead of md5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read in a few places that md5 is not really a good choice nowadays. sha1 is much better, and at least I've started using it instead of md5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
